Wireless Power Wiki

User Tools

Site Tools

Trace:
overview_of_wireless_power_transfer

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
overview_of_wireless_power_transfer [2025/04/30 15:15] – tmoverview_of_wireless_power_transfer [2025/04/30 15:16] (current) – tm
Line 17: Line 17:
 The inductive coupling technology attains the highest energy transfer efficiency, varying from 70% up to 90%. In the same figure can be seen that the efficiency for magnetic resonant coupling strongly declines to a range of 40-60%. In the near-field technology this WPT method is used for greater distances, going from a few centimetres up to a maximum of 5m. A summary of these near-field methods is given in Figure 3. The inductive coupling technology attains the highest energy transfer efficiency, varying from 70% up to 90%. In the same figure can be seen that the efficiency for magnetic resonant coupling strongly declines to a range of 40-60%. In the near-field technology this WPT method is used for greater distances, going from a few centimetres up to a maximum of 5m. A summary of these near-field methods is given in Figure 3.
  
-| {{:comparison_of_efficiency_for_different_wpt_techniques.png?400|}} |+| {{:comparison_of_efficiency_for_different_wpt_techniques.png?500|}} |
 | Figure 2 efficiency of WPT (Jawad et al., 2017, p. 8) | | Figure 2 efficiency of WPT (Jawad et al., 2017, p. 8) |
 | {{:near-field_technology_specifications.png?600|}} | | {{:near-field_technology_specifications.png?600|}} |
overview_of_wireless_power_transfer.txt · Last modified: by tm