Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- overview_of_wireless_power_transfer [2025/04/30 15:11] – [Overview] tm
+++ overview_of_wireless_power_transfer [2025/04/30 15:16] (current) – tm
@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 Wireless Power Transfer (WPT) can be implemented in many ways. The most well-known technologies in the sector today are depicted in Figure 1 and can be divided into WPT by acoustic or by electromagnetic means
-| {{:overview_wpt-technologies.png?700|}} |
+| {{:overview_wpt-technologies.png?600|}} |
 | Figure 1 overview of WPT |
@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 The inductive coupling technology attains the highest energy transfer efficiency, varying from 70% up to 90%. In the same figure can be seen that the efficiency for magnetic resonant coupling strongly declines to a range of 40-60%. In the near-field technology this WPT method is used for greater distances, going from a few centimetres up to a maximum of 5m. A summary of these near-field methods is given in Figure 3.
-{{:comparison_of_efficiency_for_different_wpt_techniques.png?400|}}Figure 2 efficiency of WPT
+| {{:comparison_of_efficiency_for_different_wpt_techniques.png?500|}} |
-{{:near-field_technology_specifications.png?600|}}Figure 3 Near-field technology specifications
+| Figure 2 efficiency of WPT (Jawad et al., 2017, p. 8) |
+| {{:near-field_technology_specifications.png?600|}} |
+| Figure 3 Near-field technology specifications (Jawad et al., 2017, p. 10) |
 ----