overview_of_wireless_power_transfer
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| overview_of_wireless_power_transfer [2025/04/30 15:11] – tm | overview_of_wireless_power_transfer [2025/04/30 15:16] (current) – tm | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| The inductive coupling technology attains the highest energy transfer efficiency, varying from 70% up to 90%. In the same figure can be seen that the efficiency for magnetic resonant coupling strongly declines to a range of 40-60%. In the near-field technology this WPT method is used for greater distances, going from a few centimetres up to a maximum of 5m. A summary of these near-field methods is given in Figure 3. | The inductive coupling technology attains the highest energy transfer efficiency, varying from 70% up to 90%. In the same figure can be seen that the efficiency for magnetic resonant coupling strongly declines to a range of 40-60%. In the near-field technology this WPT method is used for greater distances, going from a few centimetres up to a maximum of 5m. A summary of these near-field methods is given in Figure 3. | ||
| - | {{: | + | | {{: |
| - | {{: | + | | Figure 2 efficiency of WPT (Jawad et al., 2017, p. 8) | |
| + | | {{: | ||
| + | | Figure 3 Near-field technology specifications | ||
| ---- | ---- | ||
overview_of_wireless_power_transfer.1746025917.txt.gz · Last modified: by tm
