Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- partity-time_symmetric_wpt [2025/07/07 14:14] – [Output power and efficiency] kl
+++ partity-time_symmetric_wpt [2025/07/07 14:27] (current) – [Efficiency] kl
@@ Line 139: / Line 139: @@
 For $k<k_c$, the self resonant frequency, $\omega_{o3}=\omega_0$, remains the only resonance frequency in the system. From equation (4), it can be seen that the negative resistor is dependent on the coupling factor $k$ and does not automatically compensates the resistances in the network.
-FIGURE k vs frequency (e..g, FIG 3.5) HERE?
+{{ :0:pt-symmetric_frequency.png?600 |}}
 The same conclusions can be drawn for the PP compensated circuit.
@@ Line 188: / Line 190: @@
 We can see that now both the output power and efficiency are NOT constant; they change with varying coupling factor $k$.
-FIGUUR 3.6 HIER?
+In the broken PT-symmetric region, the eigenstate amplitude increases or decays exponentially, i.e., no stable region is obtained.
-PT-symmetric: eigenvalues are pure imaginary => even when there are losses present, no change in the eigenstates in time + energy distribution of the mode on both transmitting and receiving sides is mirror-symmetrical.
-Broken PT-symmetric: eigenstate amplitude increases or decays exponentially
+{{ :0:pt-symmetric_power_and_efficiency.png?600 |}}
-====Efficiency====