Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- simulating_a_time-varying_capacitor_in_spice [2024/09/10 11:45] – bm
+++ simulating_a_time-varying_capacitor_in_spice [2024/09/10 11:51] (current) – bm
@@ Line 41: / Line 41: @@
 Case (i): We apply a high frequency source in order to create an envelope facilitating comparison between both cases.
 {{:simulating_a_time-varying_capacitor_in_spice-1.png|}}
-At a certain time, e.g., t=50µs, the value of the inductor equals $L$(50µs)= 5 mH + 3 mH.sin(2π.100 kHz.50 µs)=5 mH.
+At a certain time, e.g., t=50µs, the value of the capacitor equals $C$(50µs)=  5 nF + 3 nF.sin(2π.100 kHz.50µs)=5 nF.
 If we then zoom in at the simulation at t=50µs, we find the peak value of voltage over and current through the inductor.
-Case (ii): We compare this value with a static inductor of 5 mH:
+Case (ii): We compare this value with a static inductor of 5 nF:
+{{:simulating_a_time-varying_capacitor_in_spice-2.png|}}
-{{:simulating_a_time-varying_inductor_in_spice-2.png|}}
 We find that both the current and voltage correspond to case (i).
-We do the same for a lot of other values of time, and always find a correspondence between both cases. This is not a rigid proof, but it gives us sufficient confidence that the inductor was modeled correctly in SPICE.
+We do the same for a lot of other values of time, and always find a correspondence between both cases. This is not a rigid proof, but it gives us sufficient confidence that the capacitor was modeled correctly in SPICE.